|
Speaking in Tongues Is the Unique Initial Evidence
Speaking in tongues is it the unique initial evidence that someone has been baptized with the Holy Spirit? Or should we look for another evidence? Pentecostal Christianity worldwide is believed by some researchers to number half a billion members. The vast majority of them strongly hold the doctrinal position that a person baptized with the Holy Spirit will speak in tongues as the initial evidence of that experience. That is the position that will be put forth in this bible study. Lets examine three primary Scripture portions that lead to this conclusion. Acts 1:4-5; 2:1-4 On one occasion, while he was eating with them, he gave them this command: Do not leave Jerusalem, but wait for the gift my Father promised, which you have heard me speak about. [5] For John baptized with water, but in a few days you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit. ... [2:1] When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place. [2] Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. [3] They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. [4] All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.
Acts 10:44-46 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. [45] The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on the Gentiles. [46] For they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God.
Acts 19:6 When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied.
The Scriptural conclusion? The baptism with the Holy Spirit (as we have seen in Acts 2, 10, and 19) is a unique New Testament experience. And it has a unique initial evidence speaking in tongues! The sound of a rushing, mighty wind (Acts 2:2) is not an evidence, nor is it the evidence. It occurred on only one of the New Testament instances of the baptism in the Holy Spirit. And it had occurred in the Old Testament (e.g., 1 Kings 19:11), where it was clearly not the evidence of the baptism with the Spirit. Fire, or tongues of fire (Acts 2:3), is not an evidence, nor is it the evidence of the Holy Ghost baptism. It also occurred in only one of the New Testament cases. And fire was a fairly common occurrence in the Old Testament when God revealed Himself, and again clearly not in the context of the Holy Spirit baptism. Praising God (Acts 10:46) is universal throughout Scripture. So it cannot be singled out as an evidence that one is Spirit-filled. Many non-Spirit-filled people praised God in the Old Testament. Prophecy (Acts 19:6) is likewise common in the Old Testament among those not baptized in the Holy Spirit in the abiding, Acts 2, Pentecostal way. So it too cannot be put forth as a unique evidence that one has received the baptism in the Spirit. What conclusions can be drawn from the Scriptures we have examined?
A more extensive treatment of this topic may be found at our bible study entitled "Why Speak in Tongues?" A related sermon is entitled Evidences of the Spirit-Filled Life.
--------------------------------------------- ©2005, James H. Feeney. Copyright statement. |
|